Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tromadz" data-source="post: 233612" data-attributes="member: 306">I wasn't talking about it being why he retired.I was talking about him taking a very active role in a position that isn't his.   Trying to get this guy, get those guys, keep these guys.  Isn't that why we have a GM?  To make these decisions?   And ok, Thompson said Favre didn't try to get Moss(link?) apparently.  I doubt Thompson will respond to this aspect, but I'd like to hear his answer.  Was he trying to save face and make it look like his HoF QB wasnt overstepping his boundries, while doing so, making them both look foolish?Something like "Brett wasn't actively trying to bring Moss here...and therefore doing my job which I think I'm doing very well thank you very much..."  You know, a term thats been used a lot this week, "damage control."  Favre needs to go away now.  Traded before the week is over is still my guess.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,028 (members: 0, guests: 1,028)