Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Conan Troutman" data-source="post: 821448" data-attributes="member: 12859">I think it's highly unlikely Hockenson will be there at #30. If we don't take him at #12, there's going to be a couple of need picks, but some GM will stop the fall well before #30 (mid-to-late-teens is what I'm guessing). There are more and more trades on draft day, it doesn't matter what (perceived) needs the teams in front of us have, they can just trade down if they don't need the best player on the board.Does that mean the Packers should take him at #12? Not necessarily, but if he's BPA, and he very well might be, it's not a bad idea to pull the trigger or someone else will. Do the Packers need an edge rusher or two badly? Sure, but the class is deep and other than Allen not top heavy, no reason to reach for one, just settle for the second or third best at #30. But if you want a TE who can cath and block, well there aren't many choices.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 852 (members: 0, guests: 852)