Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Fant or Hockenson?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 818737" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Hockenson is the better all around TE.</p><p>His run blocking skills are impressive in this TE group and he’s actually fun to watch on tape overall.</p><p></p><p>My concern is I don’t see him as a viable pick until #20-#30 range and a he’s not a substantial value pick until our pick at #44.</p><p>The only way I’d want to spend a pick this high at TE is if we let both Mercedes and Kendricks BOTH walk AND commit to getting said selection on the field (unlike the MIA status of Kendricks and Mercedes). We barely even used 1M worth of the 4M free agent additions last year. But last year was last year and I’m hoping our TEs don’t get ignored again this year.</p><p></p><p>Not trying to start a war here, but I’d rather get a RB or WR that’s going to be recorded first on the depth chart (used more regular) than a TE that’s listed behind Graham as a second tier option.</p><p>Are we truly going to commit to running more double TE sets than double WR sets or RB formations in the backfield??</p><p>Whatever the direction, let’s get the best talent on the field in 2019 is my main contention. That’s why OL also makes sense here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 818737, member: 10086"] Hockenson is the better all around TE. His run blocking skills are impressive in this TE group and he’s actually fun to watch on tape overall. My concern is I don’t see him as a viable pick until #20-#30 range and a he’s not a substantial value pick until our pick at #44. The only way I’d want to spend a pick this high at TE is if we let both Mercedes and Kendricks BOTH walk AND commit to getting said selection on the field (unlike the MIA status of Kendricks and Mercedes). We barely even used 1M worth of the 4M free agent additions last year. But last year was last year and I’m hoping our TEs don’t get ignored again this year. Not trying to start a war here, but I’d rather get a RB or WR that’s going to be recorded first on the depth chart (used more regular) than a TE that’s listed behind Graham as a second tier option. Are we truly going to commit to running more double TE sets than double WR sets or RB formations in the backfield?? Whatever the direction, let’s get the best talent on the field in 2019 is my main contention. That’s why OL also makes sense here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:16 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Fant or Hockenson?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top