Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
F>R Mock Draft Thread 2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Favre&gt;Rodgers259" data-source="post: 817357" data-attributes="member: 10866"><p>That article is definitely out dated, and a little misleading. That was SPECULATION on what he WOULD run as OC of the Titans, and they predicted pretty much a copycat of McVay. Fortunately, LeFleur is his own man and will have an offense of his own identity. </p><p></p><p>Keep in mind that LaFleur hired an OL coach that was not from Tennessee or LA but from San Francisco. Campen was plenty familiar with zone blocking from McCarthy, so why he couldn't stay on board most likely means a new(at least somewhat) blocking scheme altogether. What is true from that article is that his scheme will fit the players he has, and not the other way around(Looking at you Capers).</p><p></p><p>LeFleur incorporated zone blocking as well as power run based on the backs he had(Henry & Lewis). I could see him doing similar with Jones and Williams. Here are two articles that are to me a little more accurate:</p><p></p><p>What he actually did at Ten:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.packtothefuture.com/articles/xs-and-os-matt-lafleurs-wee" target="_blank">http://www.packtothefuture.com/articles/xs-and-os-matt-lafleurs-wee</a></p><p></p><p>Scouting Kyle Shanahan's offense when we played San Francisco this past October:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.packtothefuture.com/articles/xs-and-os-scouting-kyle-shanahans-offense/" target="_blank">http://www.packtothefuture.com/articles/xs-and-os-scouting-kyle-shanahans-offense/</a></p><p></p><p>The only difference in the combination of zone and power was the fact Shanahan uses cutback and misdirection, which LeFleur didn't use at all at Tennessee. I'm guessing that's a wrinkle he will throw into his new offensive design in Green Bay.</p><p></p><p>So with that being said let's just call it a stalemate. Dillard is good at zone, a liability at power. I'd rather him be equal parts, but that's just me. I'm also preferable to power because I feel if you can dominate in the power run game, you'll rarely lose if at all in pass pro. But again I'd never pick him anyway because I'm biased against Pac-12 OL.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Favre>Rodgers259, post: 817357, member: 10866"] That article is definitely out dated, and a little misleading. That was SPECULATION on what he WOULD run as OC of the Titans, and they predicted pretty much a copycat of McVay. Fortunately, LeFleur is his own man and will have an offense of his own identity. Keep in mind that LaFleur hired an OL coach that was not from Tennessee or LA but from San Francisco. Campen was plenty familiar with zone blocking from McCarthy, so why he couldn't stay on board most likely means a new(at least somewhat) blocking scheme altogether. What is true from that article is that his scheme will fit the players he has, and not the other way around(Looking at you Capers). LeFleur incorporated zone blocking as well as power run based on the backs he had(Henry & Lewis). I could see him doing similar with Jones and Williams. Here are two articles that are to me a little more accurate: What he actually did at Ten: [URL]http://www.packtothefuture.com/articles/xs-and-os-matt-lafleurs-wee[/URL] Scouting Kyle Shanahan's offense when we played San Francisco this past October: [URL]http://www.packtothefuture.com/articles/xs-and-os-scouting-kyle-shanahans-offense/[/URL] The only difference in the combination of zone and power was the fact Shanahan uses cutback and misdirection, which LeFleur didn't use at all at Tennessee. I'm guessing that's a wrinkle he will throw into his new offensive design in Green Bay. So with that being said let's just call it a stalemate. Dillard is good at zone, a liability at power. I'd rather him be equal parts, but that's just me. I'm also preferable to power because I feel if you can dominate in the power run game, you'll rarely lose if at all in pass pro. But again I'd never pick him anyway because I'm biased against Pac-12 OL. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Magooch
shockerx
mradtke66
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: SudsMcBucky
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:15 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 9:26 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:57 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
F>R Mock Draft Thread 2019
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
