Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Everyone blames the D where is the blame for the O
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Forderick" data-source="post: 486833" data-attributes="member: 7041"><p>I don't see how me saying that the packers are stuck using what worked for them in 2010 to win the super bowl and are failing to adapt in games when that isn't working anymore has anything to do with the ranking of their scoring offence. It didn't work against the niners, and the running game was doing quite well, so they abandoned the run. this is why the offence failed.</p><p> </p><p>The ranking doesn't mean anything when you are in a playoff game and fail to adjust and lose the game. Stats don't tell the whole story with this offence. A better scoring regular season offence doesn't mean jack come playoff time. </p><p> </p><p>Look at the Niners how they pretty much shut out the falcons 2nd half. the ravens did the same against the best offence in football. did their rankings have anything to do with those games? not a single thing. Your ranking are thrown out the window come playoff time, regular season records don't matter once you make it in, the point is to win the game and the packers failed to do, with a supposed better offence than when they did win in 2010. </p><p> </p><p>I feel they are stuck using (in the playoffs) what won the super bowl in 2010 , and not what got them there in their playoff wins against the eagles, falcons, and bears. </p><p> </p><p>back to the main topic, the offence failed because of poor play calling, rodgers looking for the big play instead of the play to move the chains, and the lack of running the ball. I hate to say it but rodgers to me has regressed a bit this year. He holds onto the ball too long, looks for the big play too often , but he is still a great Qb but needs some work and perhaps that will come with a more balanced attack on offence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Forderick, post: 486833, member: 7041"] I don't see how me saying that the packers are stuck using what worked for them in 2010 to win the super bowl and are failing to adapt in games when that isn't working anymore has anything to do with the ranking of their scoring offence. It didn't work against the niners, and the running game was doing quite well, so they abandoned the run. this is why the offence failed. The ranking doesn't mean anything when you are in a playoff game and fail to adjust and lose the game. Stats don't tell the whole story with this offence. A better scoring regular season offence doesn't mean jack come playoff time. Look at the Niners how they pretty much shut out the falcons 2nd half. the ravens did the same against the best offence in football. did their rankings have anything to do with those games? not a single thing. Your ranking are thrown out the window come playoff time, regular season records don't matter once you make it in, the point is to win the game and the packers failed to do, with a supposed better offence than when they did win in 2010. I feel they are stuck using (in the playoffs) what won the super bowl in 2010 , and not what got them there in their playoff wins against the eagles, falcons, and bears. back to the main topic, the offence failed because of poor play calling, rodgers looking for the big play instead of the play to move the chains, and the lack of running the ball. I hate to say it but rodgers to me has regressed a bit this year. He holds onto the ball too long, looks for the big play too often , but he is still a great Qb but needs some work and perhaps that will come with a more balanced attack on offence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Magooch
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:33 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:03 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Everyone blames the D where is the blame for the O
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
