Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Even M. Lynch knows the truth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iron Lion" data-source="post: 466339" data-attributes="member: 5995"><p>So what you guys are saying is:</p><p> </p><p>1. There was initial control by Jennings, which should trump the "fact" that there was simultaneous possession at some point.</p><p> </p><p>2. This should have been reviewable since it was in the endzone, and the replacement official totally blew the replay call.</p><p> </p><p>What I'm saying is:</p><p> </p><p>1. Once the process of the catch was completed, there was simultaneous possession. The ball was not caught only by Jennings; it was caught by both, and awarded to the offensive player.</p><p> </p><p>2. The quote about it "not being simultaneous catch if one player first has control" is something I have to look into because as I've said, I'm skeptical that it applies to the case where the feet are not down in bounds. I think it's talking about a situation where having control automatically constitutes a catch due to the other conditions being satisfied. I think the quote is taken out of context in the book. If it's not, then the rules are not clear on this issue and should be revisited.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iron Lion, post: 466339, member: 5995"] So what you guys are saying is: 1. There was initial control by Jennings, which should trump the "fact" that there was simultaneous possession at some point. 2. This should have been reviewable since it was in the endzone, and the replacement official totally blew the replay call. What I'm saying is: 1. Once the process of the catch was completed, there was simultaneous possession. The ball was not caught only by Jennings; it was caught by both, and awarded to the offensive player. 2. The quote about it "not being simultaneous catch if one player first has control" is something I have to look into because as I've said, I'm skeptical that it applies to the case where the feet are not down in bounds. I think it's talking about a situation where having control automatically constitutes a catch due to the other conditions being satisfied. I think the quote is taken out of context in the book. If it's not, then the rules are not clear on this issue and should be revisited. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: DoURant
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:26 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 3:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Even M. Lynch knows the truth
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top