Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 891519" data-attributes="member: 6578">Gary was put on a team with two massive free agent acquisitions that played GREAT...and even had a 3rd guy (Fackrell) that was coming off double digit sack year. If he had started right away that would have been a TERRIBLE sign for those before him. Also, it is VERY VERY rare to find a OLB that does as you desire that is picked outside the Top 5. Happens sure, but very very rare. You also gotta remember Gary was still a youngin' not sure he was even 21 when we drafted him.To be fair if Lazard hadn't missed some games MVS would be 3rd in targets presently...and he's still barely beating Jones and Tonyan in targets - he is essentially our 4th or 5th receiver option in our offensive system. I concur though, presently he is not a guy you want as your #3 WR in that room specifically or being your 3rd targets guy. His role is best served in that 4/5 spot for what he does.I don't see Keke and Lancaster as interchangeable. Keke to me is more of a rushing trench biggun...Lancaster is a plug holes type guy.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 824 (members: 0, guests: 824)