Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dumervile to Green Bay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pizzle" data-source="post: 726145" data-attributes="member: 12428"><p>Here's how the draft might have went under your scenario:</p><p></p><p>1st pick(33)-Jordan Willis</p><p>2nd pick(46)-Joe Mixon</p><p>3rd pick(93)-Montravious Adams</p><p>4th pick(108)-Damontae Kazee</p><p>5th pick(134)-Desmond King</p><p>6th pick(175)-DeAngelo Yancey</p><p>7th pick(212)-Kofi Amichia</p><p>8th pick(238)-Jack Tocho</p><p>9th pick(247)-Malachi Dupree</p><p></p><p>I think in order to jump back into the second round high enough to get Mixon, we would have had to give up the 61st and 182nd (5th round compensatory) picks. Also, we wouldn't have gotten 3 running backs as a result. We would have gotten 3 DBs, not only Kazee but King out of Iowa(Micah Hyde-esque player) and Tocho out of N.C. State instead of Josh Jones. I actually like this draft better, because I think that having Willis and Mixon with the potential of the 3 DBs would be worth not getting King, Jones, and the 3 RBs we got. Especially if it only meant being able to select just 1 less player. </p><p></p><p>I wouldn't have wanted Claiborne, but maybe he would have done well in our scheme if healthy. Who knows...</p><p></p><p>This is all semantics now though. Ted wanted to get a redo of the 2015 draft IMO, and that's what he did. King and Biegel better be studs sooner than later, I guess...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pizzle, post: 726145, member: 12428"] Here's how the draft might have went under your scenario: 1st pick(33)-Jordan Willis 2nd pick(46)-Joe Mixon 3rd pick(93)-Montravious Adams 4th pick(108)-Damontae Kazee 5th pick(134)-Desmond King 6th pick(175)-DeAngelo Yancey 7th pick(212)-Kofi Amichia 8th pick(238)-Jack Tocho 9th pick(247)-Malachi Dupree I think in order to jump back into the second round high enough to get Mixon, we would have had to give up the 61st and 182nd (5th round compensatory) picks. Also, we wouldn't have gotten 3 running backs as a result. We would have gotten 3 DBs, not only Kazee but King out of Iowa(Micah Hyde-esque player) and Tocho out of N.C. State instead of Josh Jones. I actually like this draft better, because I think that having Willis and Mixon with the potential of the 3 DBs would be worth not getting King, Jones, and the 3 RBs we got. Especially if it only meant being able to select just 1 less player. I wouldn't have wanted Claiborne, but maybe he would have done well in our scheme if healthy. Who knows... This is all semantics now though. Ted wanted to get a redo of the 2015 draft IMO, and that's what he did. King and Biegel better be studs sooner than later, I guess... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: OldSchool101
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: OldSchool101
44 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: sschind
Today at 8:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Draft Review
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 7:00 PM
Draft Talk
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dumervile to Green Bay?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top