Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 958809" data-attributes="member: 17987">Yep, that's how I'd put it. And IIRC I think Gute said something to the effect of "We were surprised Wyatt was there at 28" - that coupled with all the noise that we supposedly tried to move back into the first and/or thought Watson was a first-round talent makes me think that if Wyatt wasn't there then we'd have taken Watson at 28. So with that in mind - hearing a lot of complaints that we gave up too much value - per Rich Hill chart 53+59 = 197 points and 34 = 175 points, so (-22) for us. But if you look at 53+59 for 28 then it's like giving up 197 points to get back 209 points, so...not looking so bad in that sense.</blockquote>

Total: 979 (members: 1, guests: 978)