Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Draft Day Trade Partners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 497168" data-attributes="member: 7277"><p>But value at #26 compared to #40 is the perspective of each individual team, not across the board. </p><p> </p><p>My premise is that a team drafting early 2nd will be looking for their QB in the late first for a couple different reasons: 1) They are under control for 5 years vs. 4, and 2) They may likely not fall to early 2nd. </p><p> </p><p>It is actually extremely advantageous for a team to get a franchise QB late in the 1st versus early in the 2nd. It's the difference between the 49ers having Kaepernick for 4 years or 5, currently, before he would hit UFA. </p><p> </p><p>Obviously, we're not looking for a QB at #26 or #40. But to another team, it may be worth a 3rd. And I'd maintain that that far of a drop for us will command at least a 3rd -- I don't see any way TT does it for a 4th or less.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adambr2, post: 497168, member: 7277"] But value at #26 compared to #40 is the perspective of each individual team, not across the board. My premise is that a team drafting early 2nd will be looking for their QB in the late first for a couple different reasons: 1) They are under control for 5 years vs. 4, and 2) They may likely not fall to early 2nd. It is actually extremely advantageous for a team to get a franchise QB late in the 1st versus early in the 2nd. It's the difference between the 49ers having Kaepernick for 4 years or 5, currently, before he would hit UFA. Obviously, we're not looking for a QB at #26 or #40. But to another team, it may be worth a 3rd. And I'd maintain that that far of a drop for us will command at least a 3rd -- I don't see any way TT does it for a 4th or less. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
kf323
Latest posts
2024 Round 5, pick 169 (compensatory): Kitan Oladapo, S
Latest: Dantés
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 5, pick 163 Jacob Monk, OL
Latest: Dantés
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: sschind
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 4, pick 111: Evan Williams, S, Oregon
Latest: Dantés
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Draft Day Trade Partners
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top