Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 691801" data-attributes="member: 7261">I've always been in favor of this, since a penalty can have an even bigger impact on the outcome of the game then many things that are considered challengeable now. Pass interference pops right to the top of my head.  Yes, it is a judgement call, but just maybe someone taking a second and better look at it, will decide that the judgement of the first call was incorrect and it wasn't actually a 60 yard penalty or it was.The other silly part of the challenge rule IMO is being limited when your challenges are correct.  If your challenge was warranted and the play is reversed, why should that reduce the # of potential future challenges you have?  Technology seems to have sped the whole challenge process up, someone will correct me if I am wrong, so why not use it to get the correct calls.  I can wait an extra minute or two, if it means getting the call correct.  I would much rather that, than spend hours, days, years talking about how this call or that call was incorrect.</blockquote>

Total: 178 (members: 1, guests: 177)