Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do you want to the Packers to acquire Bradshaw?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="98Redbird" data-source="post: 493243" data-attributes="member: 2714"><p>Nah, not necessary. If cheap, sure, go for it. But I am not upset that we didn't pay Jackson. Nor will I be upset if we don't take a RB in the first 2 rounds. Nor will I be if we don't take Bradshaw.</p><p> </p><p>Honestly, the RB position is one of the easiest to fill. As long as you have a group of guys up front that can get the job done, most backs can produce. In the rare instances that you get an Adrian Peterson, the line isn't as important but for 99% of the backs out there, they just need a line in front of them. I would like our guys just fine, if they could stay healthy. And I think behind a line like Denver or San Fran's, they would be putting up good numbers.</p><p> </p><p>Bringing in a RB, with the line we had last year wouldn't do anything... Honestly, a stud offensive lineman would probably do just as much for our running game as a new RB would.</p><p></p><p>There's a reason that Lacy is prob going to go in the first round, there's a reason he produced like he did. And yes, he is gifted, but that line he was running behind was RIDICULOUS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="98Redbird, post: 493243, member: 2714"] Nah, not necessary. If cheap, sure, go for it. But I am not upset that we didn't pay Jackson. Nor will I be upset if we don't take a RB in the first 2 rounds. Nor will I be if we don't take Bradshaw. Honestly, the RB position is one of the easiest to fill. As long as you have a group of guys up front that can get the job done, most backs can produce. In the rare instances that you get an Adrian Peterson, the line isn't as important but for 99% of the backs out there, they just need a line in front of them. I would like our guys just fine, if they could stay healthy. And I think behind a line like Denver or San Fran's, they would be putting up good numbers. Bringing in a RB, with the line we had last year wouldn't do anything... Honestly, a stud offensive lineman would probably do just as much for our running game as a new RB would. There's a reason that Lacy is prob going to go in the first round, there's a reason he produced like he did. And yes, he is gifted, but that line he was running behind was RIDICULOUS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
mradtke66
DoURant
Schultz
Ebonypete
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: DoURant
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:26 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 3:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do you want to the Packers to acquire Bradshaw?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top