Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DILLIGAFF" data-source="post: 271216" data-attributes="member: 1719">I understand your point and you bring up what I am getting at. Early picks are usually more ready to play from day one, example Quin Johnson, he is a work in progress and really did not help the Pack all that much compared to Mathews or Raji. Not to say a year or two from now he will be an excellent player. I guess this year because of our depth and youth I vote to go after those gems and players that are NFL ready. I guess it comes down to where you think the Packers are right now, can we make a legit run next year or do we need another year of development. All this is mute point, depending on what we do in trades/free agency I guess I am debating with a time frame in my head, 1 to 3 years from now we lose DD and Woodson to age and emerging stars contracts become an issue. Todays strenghts becomes tommorrows problems.  Thats where I think quality/readness > quanity/potential for the Packers this offseason. This is coming from a guy who likes the value and potential of the late round picks. For the most part I agree with the way you want to draft, this year I am making an exception to my own rule.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 879 (members: 1, guests: 878)