Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1001087" data-attributes="member: 7261">Agree. A roster has 53 players and thinking that 1 of them, the QB, is going to elevate an otherwise weak roster to great heights, probably isn't happening.Put an average QB on a solid roster and you probably have a better chance to be competing every Sunday.Teams that "get lucky" and draft a QB that turns into a top 10 QB, usually end up having to invest a ton of money in said QB.  If they can't maintain a solid roster around him, chances are that QB can't carry them too far.Then there is the route of trading for a QB, like Russell Wilson.  So far, that has not just been a costly financial investment for the Broncos, but the draft capital he cost them compounds the problem even more.  Weak roster or Wilson just wasn't worth the investment?The Packers have a pretty solid roster and Love is the wildcard.  If he turns into a quality QB, this team should be near the top sooner than later.  Yes, they would have to eventually give Love a lot of money, but he might end up being worth it.</blockquote>

Total: 289 (members: 1, guests: 288)