Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 943928" data-attributes="member: 7261">I think that is a good compromise for sure.  With Amari Rodgers being the poster boy for the reason why.  We all know that he really isn't ready for the NFL, yet if exposed to the waiver wire, he is probably gone. Obviously, you would also have to decide if that rule allows a rookie to be placed directly on the PS at the beginning of the season or just once he is officially a member of the 53 and then slid over to the PS at some point after the 53 is declared.A guy like Taysom Hill might still be with the Packers if they could have stashed him on their PS right away, instead of having to expose him to the waiver wire.Side note, makes sense that if they were having issues with Keke that weren't getting resolved, they cut him, they needed the roster space.  Guessing there might be a few teams inquiring what the issues were.  I doubt they do, but the Packers could put him back on the PS if nobody claims him.</blockquote>

Total: 156 (members: 4, guests: 152)