Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 894348" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>With a clear pattern developing over three season's worth of evidence, it's a much smaller assumption that this is just what he wants to do, rather than trying to argue that it's because of personnel issues that have persisted over three seasons on two different teams. </p><p></p><p>That measure that you gave would leave you with the games against TB, MIN, JAC, CHI, and CAR. </p><p></p><p>The Packers scored 10, 22, 24, 41, and 24. </p><p></p><p>The Tampa Bay game, as I've stated, was about the turnovers and then a breakdown in protection in my opinion. You may not see it the same way.</p><p></p><p>The Vikings game was not actually a poor offensive showing overall. It was largely about Minnesota limiting Rodgers' opportunities. They only got 7 drives in the entire contest, which includes the 47 second opportunity they had to try and score at the end. 22 points on 7 drives is 3.14 points per drive, which would be #1 overall in the NFL this year (the Packers, incidentally, are #1 with 2.99 points/drive). </p><p></p><p>The Jacksonville and Carolina games are interesting. In the Jags' game, Rodgers had a pretty strong pass rating (108), but the offense was not nearly as effective as normal. In the Panthers' game, they were reading Rodgers/Lafleur's mail in the RPO game. They caught on to some tendencies there and exploited them. </p><p></p><p>The first Bears game was obviously a good offensive showing. </p><p></p><p>I think the evidence is mixed, but I see this as a much more valid point. I appreciate you providing a criterion that makes more sense. </p><p></p><p>I do think, however, that including the games that Adams missed all or some of the contest with injury (weeks 2-4), hurts the case. The Packers scored 42, 37, and 30 in those games, and one of them was against the Saints.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 894348, member: 12283"] With a clear pattern developing over three season's worth of evidence, it's a much smaller assumption that this is just what he wants to do, rather than trying to argue that it's because of personnel issues that have persisted over three seasons on two different teams. That measure that you gave would leave you with the games against TB, MIN, JAC, CHI, and CAR. The Packers scored 10, 22, 24, 41, and 24. The Tampa Bay game, as I've stated, was about the turnovers and then a breakdown in protection in my opinion. You may not see it the same way. The Vikings game was not actually a poor offensive showing overall. It was largely about Minnesota limiting Rodgers' opportunities. They only got 7 drives in the entire contest, which includes the 47 second opportunity they had to try and score at the end. 22 points on 7 drives is 3.14 points per drive, which would be #1 overall in the NFL this year (the Packers, incidentally, are #1 with 2.99 points/drive). The Jacksonville and Carolina games are interesting. In the Jags' game, Rodgers had a pretty strong pass rating (108), but the offense was not nearly as effective as normal. In the Panthers' game, they were reading Rodgers/Lafleur's mail in the RPO game. They caught on to some tendencies there and exploited them. The first Bears game was obviously a good offensive showing. I think the evidence is mixed, but I see this as a much more valid point. I appreciate you providing a criterion that makes more sense. I do think, however, that including the games that Adams missed all or some of the contest with injury (weeks 2-4), hurts the case. The Packers scored 42, 37, and 30 in those games, and one of them was against the Saints. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 10:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 9:25 AM
Introduce Yourself
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:16 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
