Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 894294" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>To the extent that none of us are Matt LaFleur and have the ability to speak for him, it is an assumption. But that literally describes everything you or I might deduce about this offense. </p><p></p><p>But here's what we know:</p><p></p><p>-In 2018, LaFleur's Titans were 30th in the league in 3+ WR formations behind only SF and BAL.</p><p>-In 2019, LaFleur's Packers were 22nd in the league in 3+ WR formations.</p><p>-In 2020, LaFleur's Packers are 27th in the league in 3+ WR formations.</p><p></p><p>So what's most reasonable to assume, that his offense doesn't use a lot of 3+ WR formations relative to the rest of the league (again-- that's relative to the rest of the league; not saying they're never using 3+ WR's), or that he just hasn't had the personnel? </p><p></p><p>Consider that the Packers led the league in 11 personnel % the year before LaFleur showed up with a lot of the same personnel that he had in 2019. They still dropped 21 spots, and another 6 since then. </p><p></p><p>Consider also that of the teams that come out of the same offensive philosophy (SF, CLEV, LA, MIN, TEN), only LA runs a lot of 3+ WR sets. Those other teams, the 49ers, the Browns, the Vikings, the Titans, are all filling out the very bottom of the league in terms of 3+ WR sets. </p><p></p><p>So my assumption has all of that as a basis. What's behind your assumption?</p><p></p><p>And as I've mentioned, the Bucs loss was about spotting TB 14 points and an inability to protect Rodgers. The disruption from the LOS didn't give the offense a chance to see if the WR's were going to be good enough or not. </p><p></p><p>And if you don't think that looking at games in which Adams was absent or not the leading receiver is a good measure, feel free to suggest a different measure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 894294, member: 12283"] To the extent that none of us are Matt LaFleur and have the ability to speak for him, it is an assumption. But that literally describes everything you or I might deduce about this offense. But here's what we know: -In 2018, LaFleur's Titans were 30th in the league in 3+ WR formations behind only SF and BAL. -In 2019, LaFleur's Packers were 22nd in the league in 3+ WR formations. -In 2020, LaFleur's Packers are 27th in the league in 3+ WR formations. So what's most reasonable to assume, that his offense doesn't use a lot of 3+ WR formations relative to the rest of the league (again-- that's relative to the rest of the league; not saying they're never using 3+ WR's), or that he just hasn't had the personnel? Consider that the Packers led the league in 11 personnel % the year before LaFleur showed up with a lot of the same personnel that he had in 2019. They still dropped 21 spots, and another 6 since then. Consider also that of the teams that come out of the same offensive philosophy (SF, CLEV, LA, MIN, TEN), only LA runs a lot of 3+ WR sets. Those other teams, the 49ers, the Browns, the Vikings, the Titans, are all filling out the very bottom of the league in terms of 3+ WR sets. So my assumption has all of that as a basis. What's behind your assumption? And as I've mentioned, the Bucs loss was about spotting TB 14 points and an inability to protect Rodgers. The disruption from the LOS didn't give the offense a chance to see if the WR's were going to be good enough or not. And if you don't think that looking at games in which Adams was absent or not the leading receiver is a good measure, feel free to suggest a different measure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 10:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 9:25 AM
Introduce Yourself
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:16 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
