Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 893395" data-attributes="member: 10441">Nobody has argued we have a great WR room with talent bursting at the seams.  Everyone can see that's not the case.  The debate has always been that football is a team sport and they had a plan to make this team go.  A team is not dependent solely on the WR position and how strong it is.  Some offenses need better than others to make them go.  Just like some teams have better defenses, better run games, better QB's better special teams etc.  Heck the Bears made it with **** Rexy as their QB.  They went to a super bowl on pretty much special teams and defensive scores one year.  The Pats were Brady, Gronk and Oline and people for decades practically.  and defense.But I think it's plenty obvious, while we'd like "better" WR's, there are limited resources and they've put together a pretty good team.  I'd say if anything, the offense has looked better or worse almost entirely on the way the offensive line has been playing more than anything else.  But then there are no 1 way streets in football.  the run game and WR's effect the job of the Oline and vice versa.  it all matters.as far as how good does this team do in the post season?I'd say Oline, Rodgers, defensive front, special teams and run game are going to be more impactful than another WR.</blockquote>

Total: 605 (members: 2, guests: 603)