Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 893370"><p>The Packers have won 71 consecutive games entering the fourth quarter with a lead of at least 14 points with the last last occurring in 2003.</p><p></p><p>I'm quite sure the Titans would have to change the approach on offense in thst scenario.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It could be an indicator for a team lacking talent at wide receiver as well. In addition the Titans and Vikings both have dominant running backs factors into it as well.</p><p></p><p>As a side note, while the Packers use three receivers less often than most teams they still line up in that formation on more than half of the snaps.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Adams not being the leading receiver is a curious stat to use as opponents definitely game plan to limit his impact allowing others to receive more opportunities. While that has worked against some teams it's pretty obvious the Bucs and Panthers found a way to slow down the Packers offense that way with a lack of talent behind #17 at WR definitely contributing to it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't mention anything like that at all. I was just pointing out that you were wrong that the wide receiving corps wasn't part of the problem vs. the Bucs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As mentioned in this thread I'm surprised the Packers offense has been one of the highest scoring units in the league despite a lack of talent at wide receiver. They could be even more dangerous with better players at the position though and might have an answer to opponents being able to limit Adams' impact.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We still have to wait and see if the Packers receiving corps is good enough to win the Super Bowl this season.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm quite sure Pokerbrat didn't mention that he would be glad if the offense struggles. Once again, I'm not using Adams drop vs. the Bucs as evidence that the receiving is lacking talent but that you were wrong in mentioning it didn't contribute to the offensive woes against the Bucs.</p><p></p><p>The Packers facing teams that combine to rank 22nd in points allowed in the games Adams wasn't the leading receiver definitely contributed to the offense not struggling in some of those games. Unfortunately the Packers won't face a lot of teams with below average defenses in the playoffs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 893370"] The Packers have won 71 consecutive games entering the fourth quarter with a lead of at least 14 points with the last last occurring in 2003. I'm quite sure the Titans would have to change the approach on offense in thst scenario. It could be an indicator for a team lacking talent at wide receiver as well. In addition the Titans and Vikings both have dominant running backs factors into it as well. As a side note, while the Packers use three receivers less often than most teams they still line up in that formation on more than half of the snaps. Adams not being the leading receiver is a curious stat to use as opponents definitely game plan to limit his impact allowing others to receive more opportunities. While that has worked against some teams it's pretty obvious the Bucs and Panthers found a way to slow down the Packers offense that way with a lack of talent behind #17 at WR definitely contributing to it. I didn't mention anything like that at all. I was just pointing out that you were wrong that the wide receiving corps wasn't part of the problem vs. the Bucs. As mentioned in this thread I'm surprised the Packers offense has been one of the highest scoring units in the league despite a lack of talent at wide receiver. They could be even more dangerous with better players at the position though and might have an answer to opponents being able to limit Adams' impact. We still have to wait and see if the Packers receiving corps is good enough to win the Super Bowl this season. I'm quite sure Pokerbrat didn't mention that he would be glad if the offense struggles. Once again, I'm not using Adams drop vs. the Bucs as evidence that the receiving is lacking talent but that you were wrong in mentioning it didn't contribute to the offensive woes against the Bucs. The Packers facing teams that combine to rank 22nd in points allowed in the games Adams wasn't the leading receiver definitely contributed to the offense not struggling in some of those games. Unfortunately the Packers won't face a lot of teams with below average defenses in the playoffs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
58 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 6:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
