Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 893313" data-attributes="member: 12283">This is the confirmation bias that I've been talking about. Teams that run this offense are nearly all using 3 or 4 WR sets less than anyone in the league, which is a clear indicator that it's part of the design of the offense. And yet the manufactured explanation is a lack of WR talent. The Packers offense, and Rodgers in particular, is exceptionally effective all season when Adams is out or not the leading receiver. And yet the manufactured explanation is a lack of WR talent.The Packers' elite WR causes an interception two months ago and that's used as evidence that the WR corps was the problem, which makes no sense at all.</blockquote>

Total: 752 (members: 1, guests: 751)