Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 893240">I believe in player development. But it's completely unrealistic to expect most of the young players to significantly improve.Therefore I don't agree with the Packers relying on it at the receiver position entering this season.The losses caused by COVID-19 will be spread out over four years. The cap won't be back to normal for 2022.The Packers are currently in a situation some posters expected them to be entering the season. They are a contender with their draft class hardly having an impact at all.I don't see any reason to get over it as some rookies contributing would increase their chances to win the Super Bowl this season.Interestingly those teams you mentioned lack talent after the top two receivers at the position as well.Rodgers is the Packers' best player. The issue being that an opponent limiting Adams' contribution results in #12 and therefore the entire offense struggling at times though.The wide receivers were definitely part of the problem vs. the Bucs. One of the turnovers was a pass Adams wasn't able to hold on to, deflecting it into the hands of a defender.Adams is actually third in the league in yards after catch at 530.The Packers can only clinch the first seed vs. the Titans if the Seahawks lose to the Rams this week.The Titans passing game is better than you give them credit for.</blockquote>

Total: 743 (members: 1, guests: 742)