Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 893162" data-attributes="member: 7261">Right, because you never hear it talked about by the local or National media, before, during and after most games.  I never said "don't bring Funchess back."  I said they shouldn't not bring other guys in because they think Funchess will be a starter.  The guy has played in 1 game in the last 2 seasons.  I don't think he even worked out with Rodgers before he opted out.  Just saying that EQ and Malik have grown is exactly the problem with the thought process here.  How have they grown?  Between them they have 11 catches.  I think Lazard and MVS have made some progress, but until they both start having consistently good games, I wouldn't count too much on them either.I get it, people see how productive Rodgers and the offense has been and immediately want to say "no problems with the WR's on this team".  I would beg to differ and say "imagine the offense with a better group of WR's."  Rodgers has also made full use of his RB's and TE's this year.Anyway, Funchess, Lazard, MVS, EQ and maybe Taylor will all most likely be back in 2021 to compete for jobs, I just hope they have some stiffer competition than each other for the 2-5 spots.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 370 (members: 0, guests: 370)