Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 886599" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>So your only rationale, as well as your measuring stick of a successful move, seems to be based on whether that team wins a Super Bowl? Otherwise, all moves are just filling perceived but not actual needs that a team perceives it might have. You also extend this to your own life by saying that you don't really need things either and you are comfortable with what you have. So for you, it is fine to just set the bar lower and not improve the situation, since a football team/you are comfortable as is? I never said that signing AB, Dez or Sanders was a guarantee to win a SB, nor a guarantee to improve. However, they are moves done by teams with winning records, trying to improve their chances at winning a SB. I think if you ask the GM's making such moves, they aren't just moves to make moves as you want to imply.</p><p></p><p>You seem to be set on saying the Packers (or you) don't "Need X", you are right, because there is a difference between "Need" and "could use". Nobody "needs" anything except air, water and food to survive. A football team only needs 11 players at a time on the field to play football. So yes you are correct, we can all settle for less and at the end of the day survive. Now if you are talking about success and making it to the top, your "could use" probably should be viewed with higher priority, but that just all depends where you set your own personal bar I guess. However, I don't think you should continue to measure the success of a football team or the moves it makes by using the ultimate bar, winning a Super Bowl, if you don't recognize the difference between "could" and "should".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 886599, member: 7261"] So your only rationale, as well as your measuring stick of a successful move, seems to be based on whether that team wins a Super Bowl? Otherwise, all moves are just filling perceived but not actual needs that a team perceives it might have. You also extend this to your own life by saying that you don't really need things either and you are comfortable with what you have. So for you, it is fine to just set the bar lower and not improve the situation, since a football team/you are comfortable as is? I never said that signing AB, Dez or Sanders was a guarantee to win a SB, nor a guarantee to improve. However, they are moves done by teams with winning records, trying to improve their chances at winning a SB. I think if you ask the GM's making such moves, they aren't just moves to make moves as you want to imply. You seem to be set on saying the Packers (or you) don't "Need X", you are right, because there is a difference between "Need" and "could use". Nobody "needs" anything except air, water and food to survive. A football team only needs 11 players at a time on the field to play football. So yes you are correct, we can all settle for less and at the end of the day survive. Now if you are talking about success and making it to the top, your "could use" probably should be viewed with higher priority, but that just all depends where you set your own personal bar I guess. However, I don't think you should continue to measure the success of a football team or the moves it makes by using the ultimate bar, winning a Super Bowl, if you don't recognize the difference between "could" and "should". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 2:22 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Devin Funchess has opted out of the 2020 season
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
