Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 886550" data-attributes="member: 7261">Oh, you were talking about needing just one? No wonder we disagree. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/roflmao.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":roflmao:" title="ROFLMAO    :roflmao:" data-shortname=":roflmao:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/roflmao.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":roflmao:" title="ROFLMAO    :roflmao:" data-shortname=":roflmao:" />If we don't need one to win, then in your mind, we are set, so why bother having this conversation?I am trying to remember, but didn't you take the same stance a number of years ago, when  the Packers were desperately trying to fix the secondary?  I might have you mixed up with someone else.Quite often, The good teams don't seem to sit idle, they make moves.  We saw the 49'ers trade for Sanders last year, the Ravens sign Dez Bryant, the Buccaneers sign Antonio Brown, Belichick always seems to be tweaking his roster.  If your argument against such a move is "those teams didn't or won't win a Superbowl because of that move", then why discuss anything any team does along the way?  Only 1 team wins the SB each year.  Does that make the other 31 teams decisions during the season bad or unnecessary ones?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 275 (members: 0, guests: 275)