Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sanguine camper" data-source="post: 879835" data-attributes="member: 9744"><p>Losing Funchess isn't a big deal. I think that the Packers already have 3 big-bodied receivers in Lazard. ESB, and Scandling. I don't see Funchess being that much better than those 3 especially since he's new and it takes time to get AR's trust. If the Packers don't get much of a deep threat then the safeties will play up. That really illiminates a lot of short passing lanes and makes it harder to run the ball. Without a deep threat they won't run the ball as effectively or have much of a short passing g game.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 837 (members: 4, guests: 833)