Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 608534" data-attributes="member: 4300">It’s funny how widely opinions differ on some players. Not only where they should be taken in the draft but in the evaluation of their traits. That certainly is the case for Randall in spades. Some see him as a legit first rounder, others call him a mid-rounder, or worse. Some say he’s the worst tackler in the draft (Drew Boylhart - The Huddle Report) and others see him as a physical presence in the D backfield.  I don’t know anything about Chase Goodbread (except a distant ancestor was probably a baker) but here’s what he had to say about Randall in a piece titled, 2015 NFL Draft: Five most physical defensive backs, on the nfl site:  <a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000483405/article/2015-nfl-draft-five-most-physical-defensive-backs" target="_blank">http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000483405/article/2015-nfl-draft-five-most-physical-defensive-backs</a>So there you have it. He's either a legit first rounder or he should have stuck with baseball. He was either the worst tackler in college football or one of the most physical DBs. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/confused.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:" data-shortname=":confused:" /></blockquote>

Total: 633 (members: 3, guests: 630)