Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Defending Janis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 666663" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I actually think your post (and Bubba's) in a round about way hit the nail on the head, at least for me. First, I am a Packer fan, so I want both Adams and Janis to both be future hall of famers. But if the season started today and nothing had changed from last season and I was MM, I would be trotting a healthy Adams out there over a healthy Janis. Why? Because of his total body of work over the last 2 seasons both on and off the field, as well as the obvious trust of his QB. Sure Adams had his moments of bad play in 2015, but so did Janis as well as AR, Cobb and the rest of the offense. But Adams has a pretty full 2 year resume with plenty of good and some bad. With most of the bad coming last season, a season in which he wasn't always playing healthy. Janis on the other hand, has a pretty blank resume. Lots of notes on things he needs to improve on and off the field, some not so shining moments with the few opportunities he was provided and ends with what some perceive as a career defining game in AZ, that's it....end of resume.</p><p></p><p>Both of them will have a chance to prove themselves before opening day, but IMO because of his limited body of work, Janis still has a lot more to prove of himself, before he moves up the depth chart.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 666663, member: 7261"] I actually think your post (and Bubba's) in a round about way hit the nail on the head, at least for me. First, I am a Packer fan, so I want both Adams and Janis to both be future hall of famers. But if the season started today and nothing had changed from last season and I was MM, I would be trotting a healthy Adams out there over a healthy Janis. Why? Because of his total body of work over the last 2 seasons both on and off the field, as well as the obvious trust of his QB. Sure Adams had his moments of bad play in 2015, but so did Janis as well as AR, Cobb and the rest of the offense. But Adams has a pretty full 2 year resume with plenty of good and some bad. With most of the bad coming last season, a season in which he wasn't always playing healthy. Janis on the other hand, has a pretty blank resume. Lots of notes on things he needs to improve on and off the field, some not so shining moments with the few opportunities he was provided and ends with what some perceive as a career defining game in AZ, that's it....end of resume. Both of them will have a chance to prove themselves before opening day, but IMO because of his limited body of work, Janis still has a lot more to prove of himself, before he moves up the depth chart. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Sanguine camper
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Sanguine camper
A moment ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Heyjoe4
6 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Heyjoe4
50 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Amish 57th Annual Draft Contest - by proxy
Latest: Pkrjones
Yesterday at 9:19 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 5, pick 163 Jacob Monk, OL
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 9:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Defending Janis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top