Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Eclipse612" data-source="post: 259000" data-attributes="member: 1487">First, that comparison with the other QBs in the league is actually good for Rodgers: you're basically saying that in his 2nd year as a starter he is the 7th best QB in the league, and I think it's pretty impressive. He's better than a lot of more experienced guys, he can overcome some in the future, some will retire. I guess we're OK at the QB spot for a long time barring serious injuries. Anyway, even admitting that Favre would win more games than A-Rod if he was still a Packer (which in the end is something we can only speculate on), do you think haunting the future of the franchise would have been worth it?I'm seriously surprised about how well and consistent Favre has played so far this year, and of course it hurts seeing him do so good for a rival. That said, I'm still 100% convinced that TT did the right thing for the future of the team by going with the young guy AFTER Brett did retire.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 240 (members: 1, guests: 239)