Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hauschild" data-source="post: 258969" data-attributes="member: 1638">Rodgers was directly responsible for half the sacks against Minnesota and probably close to half on the season.  And, this is the whole point.  How can you people casually look past the points I make like Rodgers holds no responsibility for the sack problem and the Packers record???  Rodgers has very little pocket awareness and it grows exponentially when his receivers appear to be covered - he has issues "anticipating" receivers breaking open, so this lends itself to holding onto the ball too long, thus sacks.It isn't something Rodgers can change in a week and like I stated THREE weeks ago - you have to put these Packers victories in their proper context in terms of the quality of teams beaten.  The Packers are a highly inconsistent football team until they prove otherwise, which will be thru the end of their season NOT in a string of two or three games against cupcakes.This is nothing against Rodgers personally.  Many of us tend to feel the need to make things personal, but that's not how I roll.  I'm simple.  Give me victories and you earn my respect and loyalty.  Give me excuses and you're wasting our time.</blockquote>

Total: 580 (members: 1, guests: 579)