Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="thequick12" data-source="post: 906824" data-attributes="member: 9797">Id love to see them end up with two second rounders somehow, 3 would just be the cats ***.  I've always thought the 2nd was the best round.  So many good players left...Just think if they could get one of those wrs, I prefer Marshall Jr or Moore...And one of those tackles I prefer Jenkins or Cosmi but honestly jenkins is a for sure 10 year starter at either tackle spot...And one of the defensive guys I prefer Cox or Moerig but Barrmore or Basham wouldn't make me much less happy.  I like Holland a lot too as do the Packers...They might be able to do that with 2 seconds and a 3rd.  But I also like Ihmir smith marsette in that late 3rd early 4th area but to be honest I won't be surprised if the Packers take him in the 2nd.  They have the philosophy of better to take a guy a round early than miss out on him altogether.  And while I don't agree with doing that consistently smh I do get it.  It's just not an efficient way of using your draft capital.  I'm certain they could of traded back to early 2nd and still gotten stokes...But props to you, you called him in the first a long time ago!!! And I love the player that dude is gonna be good he's the definition of a playmaker so now you got him and Alexander.  Wow! If alexander starts holding onto the ball like he did in the nfccg uh oh</blockquote>

Total: 1,198 (members: 5, guests: 1,193)