Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Datone Jones signs with the Vikings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 715133"><p>Apply that across the roster...that's over $40 mil in incentives.</p><p></p><p>1. "Likely to be Earned" incentives (generally speaking, those that match prior year performance) count against the cap anyway. One's not falling in that category create an unpredictability of where you'll be cap wise. Either way, your cash spend is uncertain.</p><p></p><p>2. So long as another team will offer few fewer incentives and more signing bonus and salary, insisting on incentives is a competitive disadvantage.</p><p></p><p>The way the whole thing is structured in the CBA and the fact it is a competitive market for talent (barring illegal collusion), that while we might like to see a pig with wings for the entertainment value, it's not going to happen.</p><p></p><p>A small incentive here or there, or on rare occasion one big one, sure. But you're not going to see 25% of the cap covered under incentives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 715133"] Apply that across the roster...that's over $40 mil in incentives. 1. "Likely to be Earned" incentives (generally speaking, those that match prior year performance) count against the cap anyway. One's not falling in that category create an unpredictability of where you'll be cap wise. Either way, your cash spend is uncertain. 2. So long as another team will offer few fewer incentives and more signing bonus and salary, insisting on incentives is a competitive disadvantage. The way the whole thing is structured in the CBA and the fact it is a competitive market for talent (barring illegal collusion), that while we might like to see a pig with wings for the entertainment value, it's not going to happen. A small incentive here or there, or on rare occasion one big one, sure. But you're not going to see 25% of the cap covered under incentives. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
monte smith
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 2:22 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Datone Jones signs with the Vikings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top