Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Damn....I hate to say this but Dallas did good...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 959557" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I’m not sure it was that bad, but they needed much more help than we did. The Packers got 4-5 players that will contribute early imo. Also that includes ST</p><p>Walker, Wyatt, Watson, Whisky, Whatsup.. ok ok.. I completely fabricated the last couple guys to keep it light n airy in here. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I don’t see more than 2-3 guys on that Dallas list who will possibly get early roles and substantial production. It looks like a bunch of guys who get backup roles and either have injuries or off field concerns (Dallas is gambling).</p><p></p><p>One other thing I’d point out that has absolutely nothing to do with your post, lol. Is that where did these draft grades come from? Yours is probably more in line with reality. If the league mean is a “C”. How do 31 teams score above a C? I’m employing our draft professor for a rating curve as the average is clearly a B or B+ based on all the grades I’m being handed out.</p><p></p><p>Either that or we are all possibly grading our own papers, which is really quite scary! </p><p>I give the Packers an A+</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 959557, member: 10086"] I’m not sure it was that bad, but they needed much more help than we did. The Packers got 4-5 players that will contribute early imo. Also that includes ST Walker, Wyatt, Watson, Whisky, Whatsup.. ok ok.. I completely fabricated the last couple guys to keep it light n airy in here. :) I don’t see more than 2-3 guys on that Dallas list who will possibly get early roles and substantial production. It looks like a bunch of guys who get backup roles and either have injuries or off field concerns (Dallas is gambling). One other thing I’d point out that has absolutely nothing to do with your post, lol. Is that where did these draft grades come from? Yours is probably more in line with reality. If the league mean is a “C”. How do 31 teams score above a C? I’m employing our draft professor for a rating curve as the average is clearly a B or B+ based on all the grades I’m being handed out. Either that or we are all possibly grading our own papers, which is really quite scary! I give the Packers an A+ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
ExpatPacker
Emur
Guacamole
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
4 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Damn....I hate to say this but Dallas did good...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top