Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GleefulGary" data-source="post: 761683" data-attributes="member: 12583">I mean, I don't think draftniks are that incredibly high on Fumagalli either, but maybe some are. I can think of a decent number that I would have over Fumagalli.1: Mark Andrews - Oklahoma2: Dallas Goedert - SDSU3: Hayden Hurst - USC4: Mike Gesicki - PSU5: Dalton Schultz - Stanfordand then you have a plethora of guys like Chris Herndon, Ian Thomas, Fumagalli, Durham Smythe who are all around the same impact level, but have different strengths/weaknesses depending on team. I would probably have Hurst higher, but he's going to be a 25 year old rookie. Good player though. But yeah, Fumagalli can block, he can run routes, and he does have good hands. However, he doesn't block very well, he doesn't run routes very well, and he's not very fast. He's not going to be any better, impact wise, than Lance Kendricks...so he's a TE2 imo. He's not bad, I just think we can do better.</blockquote>

Total: 1,023 (members: 1, guests: 1,022)