Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Could I suggest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RRyder" data-source="post: 639030" data-attributes="member: 10329"><p>Thank you guys for proving my point and continuing to perpetuate the 3 man rush rarely works. In LONG yardage situations it actually is effective. You guys can argue against it but sorry it's just the way it is.</p><p></p><p>There's a reason why almost all coaches in LONG yardage situations op for it. Cause having that extra defender in the defensive backfield cuts down on the chance of a blown coverage and helps make up for it when it does happen.</p><p></p><p>Once again this is simply a case of having selective memories and you might be right on that most "fans" would vote against it. I even said its a myth perpetauted by fans. Doesnt make them right. And as the old saying goes "As a coach once you let the fans start dictating anything that happens with your team you'll be watching the game in the stands with them soon enough."</p><p></p><p>Screw it though. Start a poll. Now I'm curious. One play and 50+ yards to go. Who's thinks rushing 4 or more is the way to go or do you vote to play coverage?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RRyder, post: 639030, member: 10329"] Thank you guys for proving my point and continuing to perpetuate the 3 man rush rarely works. In LONG yardage situations it actually is effective. You guys can argue against it but sorry it's just the way it is. There's a reason why almost all coaches in LONG yardage situations op for it. Cause having that extra defender in the defensive backfield cuts down on the chance of a blown coverage and helps make up for it when it does happen. Once again this is simply a case of having selective memories and you might be right on that most "fans" would vote against it. I even said its a myth perpetauted by fans. Doesnt make them right. And as the old saying goes "As a coach once you let the fans start dictating anything that happens with your team you'll be watching the game in the stands with them soon enough." Screw it though. Start a poll. Now I'm curious. One play and 50+ yards to go. Who's thinks rushing 4 or more is the way to go or do you vote to play coverage? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Could I suggest
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top