Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Conservative 2nd Half Play Calling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 680141" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Precisely.</p><p>It's a gutsy call. IMO there are times when that would've been the right call to make. Such as a high scoring game where we're trading TDs all day. This particular game points were already at a premium and we were struggling.</p><p> I believe he thought a 1st down would get us momentum so I get that because I'm a huge proponent for gaining momentum. But even a 1st down didn't guarantee us points. Mikes argument could've made if we were at the 1 because we were playing solid D and the turnover field position is ugly for them and a good surge gets a safety. But we were not. Too much risk vs. a gimme 3 points in a low scoring contest without a "goal to go" scenario </p><p> There is one thing that still trumps momentum.. POINTS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 680141, member: 10086"] Precisely. It's a gutsy call. IMO there are times when that would've been the right call to make. Such as a high scoring game where we're trading TDs all day. This particular game points were already at a premium and we were struggling. I believe he thought a 1st down would get us momentum so I get that because I'm a huge proponent for gaining momentum. But even a 1st down didn't guarantee us points. Mikes argument could've made if we were at the 1 because we were playing solid D and the turnover field position is ugly for them and a good surge gets a safety. But we were not. Too much risk vs. a gimme 3 points in a low scoring contest without a "goal to go" scenario There is one thing that still trumps momentum.. POINTS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
GreenBaySlacker
SudsMcBucky
gopkrs
Emur
Latest posts
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Voyageur
35 minutes ago
Draft Talk
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
49 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
Today at 10:21 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Krabs
Today at 9:37 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Conservative 2nd Half Play Calling
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top