Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 604890"><p>Well, isn't that curious. He couldn't run anybody down in coverage and he didn't make any tackles in the run game, but somehow he did not rank in the bottom 18% among 500+ snap LBs in tackles per snaps minus incompletions. McGuin attributed Hawk's scant 4 missed tackles to never getting to the ball and getting run over (as though getting run over is never a missed missed tackle). I'd be curious to know where Hawk actually stood in that PFF ranking of tackles/(snaps-incompletions).</p><p></p><p>Hawk must have had some mild secret sauce we're overlooking. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>I think if we were having this discussion immediately after the season, the assessment would be that the next guy on the depth chart, Lattimore, couldn't be any worse. Where is <em>he</em> now?</p><p></p><p>Again, the point being, "some guy" currently on the roster being at least as good as Hawk is a suspect proposition. Beyond that, "just as good" is not close to sufficient, particularly given the current state of the D-Line. I know we're in agreement on this last point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 604890"] Well, isn't that curious. He couldn't run anybody down in coverage and he didn't make any tackles in the run game, but somehow he did not rank in the bottom 18% among 500+ snap LBs in tackles per snaps minus incompletions. McGuin attributed Hawk's scant 4 missed tackles to never getting to the ball and getting run over (as though getting run over is never a missed missed tackle). I'd be curious to know where Hawk actually stood in that PFF ranking of tackles/(snaps-incompletions). Hawk must have had some mild secret sauce we're overlooking. ;) I think if we were having this discussion immediately after the season, the assessment would be that the next guy on the depth chart, Lattimore, couldn't be any worse. Where is [I]he[/I] now? Again, the point being, "some guy" currently on the roster being at least as good as Hawk is a suspect proposition. Beyond that, "just as good" is not close to sufficient, particularly given the current state of the D-Line. I know we're in agreement on this last point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
RicFlairoftheNFL
Firethorn1001
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:32 AM
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top