Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 604886"><p>The PPF numbers exclude incompletions. They should have also excluded interceptions (a minor consideration), but you can't think of everything. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> That's a better number than tackles per snap. Hawk was not a good run defender. But he was not as bad as McGuin or most posters on this board want to portray him.</p><p></p><p>The point of this argument, which I'm sure you understand but others may not, is properly assessing Hawk's play sets the bar for what constitutes improvement in a 2-down ILB. That bar is higher than most think.</p><p></p><p>Of course, Spikes would blow through that threshold as would several ILB prospects in the first 2 rounds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 604886"] The PPF numbers exclude incompletions. They should have also excluded interceptions (a minor consideration), but you can't think of everything. ;) That's a better number than tackles per snap. Hawk was not a good run defender. But he was not as bad as McGuin or most posters on this board want to portray him. The point of this argument, which I'm sure you understand but others may not, is properly assessing Hawk's play sets the bar for what constitutes improvement in a 2-down ILB. That bar is higher than most think. Of course, Spikes would blow through that threshold as would several ILB prospects in the first 2 rounds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ExpatPacker
gopkrs
King of Jeans
PackerDNA
weeds
Packermudgeon
RepStar15
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: gopkrs
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
20 minutes ago
Draft Talk
R
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top