Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 604800"><p>I would question that assumption.</p><p></p><p>Hawk played almost exclusively in base D after the bye with Matthews moving over in nickel. We should be expecting more or less of the same from Matthews.</p><p></p><p>Assuming any of the ILBs currently on the roster would be better than Hawk in base D is just that...an assumption.</p><p></p><p>If anyone believes that <strong><em>anybody</em></strong> would be better than Hawk in base D they have not watched enough football, and certainly have not taken note of Palmer when he's been on the field or Lattimore when he's tried to cover anybody.</p><p></p><p>Jones is an irrelevancy. He was a spot player buried in the depth chart and on special teams after the bye. His departure merits no consideration. If he happened to screw up every time he took the field, that's on the coaches. There were other options on the roster, the same options on the roster today, that they chose not to use. I do not consider it an improvement when the coaches are deprived of a bad player thereby forcing them to play an equally or less bad player in his place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 604800"] I would question that assumption. Hawk played almost exclusively in base D after the bye with Matthews moving over in nickel. We should be expecting more or less of the same from Matthews. Assuming any of the ILBs currently on the roster would be better than Hawk in base D is just that...an assumption. If anyone believes that [B][I]anybody[/I][/B] would be better than Hawk in base D they have not watched enough football, and certainly have not taken note of Palmer when he's been on the field or Lattimore when he's tried to cover anybody. Jones is an irrelevancy. He was a spot player buried in the depth chart and on special teams after the bye. His departure merits no consideration. If he happened to screw up every time he took the field, that's on the coaches. There were other options on the roster, the same options on the roster today, that they chose not to use. I do not consider it an improvement when the coaches are deprived of a bad player thereby forcing them to play an equally or less bad player in his place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ExpatPacker
Schultz
DoURant
Team Ronny
PackerDNA
swhitset
Latest posts
S
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Schultz
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Schultz
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 2nd Rd pick #45 Edgerrin Cooper LB
Latest: Schultz
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: PackerDNA
22 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: AmishMafia
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top