Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chris Carter says......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slackerbacker" data-source="post: 7632" data-attributes="member: 27"><p>Believe me, I here what you and others are saying and it has a lot of merit; I'd just like to see them avoid a Win-Lose situation w/ JW. I think they can do it another way if JW truely wants to get it done...finacial security can be acheived in a number of ways...??? I do think it's different because JW is in his first contract. The other guys you mentioned are older, declining, or have an injury past. JW is clearly the type of player any team would like to build their offense around. He's young, strong, athletic, injury free and most of all very productive. I don't think you can say that about the others you mentioned. No doubt, the agreement would have to have the right "spin" on it to avoid the negative effects your eluding to. Can't Miller, John Deer or someone else up there offer the guy a TV commerical or something? I am still confused on his actual contract. Isn't 07 his option to acept or decline? I'd like to here some others comment on the RFA side of this. Again, if 07 is his option to accept or decline, doesn't that make 06 his UFA year and this off season his RFA year? If I am close to being right, the case could be made for re-working his deal w/out having to do everyone elses; he</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slackerbacker, post: 7632, member: 27"] Believe me, I here what you and others are saying and it has a lot of merit; I'd just like to see them avoid a Win-Lose situation w/ JW. I think they can do it another way if JW truely wants to get it done...finacial security can be acheived in a number of ways...??? I do think it's different because JW is in his first contract. The other guys you mentioned are older, declining, or have an injury past. JW is clearly the type of player any team would like to build their offense around. He's young, strong, athletic, injury free and most of all very productive. I don't think you can say that about the others you mentioned. No doubt, the agreement would have to have the right "spin" on it to avoid the negative effects your eluding to. Can't Miller, John Deer or someone else up there offer the guy a TV commerical or something? I am still confused on his actual contract. Isn't 07 his option to acept or decline? I'd like to here some others comment on the RFA side of this. Again, if 07 is his option to accept or decline, doesn't that make 06 his UFA year and this off season his RFA year? If I am close to being right, the case could be made for re-working his deal w/out having to do everyone elses; he [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Sanguine camper
22 minutes ago
Draft Talk
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: edensmage
Today at 3:40 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:50 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
Latest: Dantés
Today at 2:26 PM
Draft Talk
S
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Schultz
Today at 12:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chris Carter says......
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top