Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chandon Sullivan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 860527" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>It all boils down to training refs to officiate a game by the desired outcomes and not just by what they see on the field. If an official thinks he's down and the play is over, fine, blow the whistle. If he doesn't think he's down let it play a second. If you're not in position, you're not the whistle man. </p><p></p><p>But what we get or officials trained for different situations and when to use a whistle and when not to for injury, for replay, for this, for that, rather than use the whistle to officiate what YOU SEE.</p><p></p><p>i know they'll get some wrong. But they don't blow a whistle 2 years in a row in GB Detroit games to let it play out for replay despite not a single official seeing it touch a GB player, only replay can't get it right. Should have been blown dead the second a Detroit defender touched it. And yesterday they blow it quick and replay still can't get it right. Just get officials that call mostly a good game, they exist, we've had them before, and let them officiate a game by what they see and call it good. The rest just adds more layers of controversy and it doesn't help. </p><p></p><p>Then we're sitting here today, man, it was close, but the ball was out. Instead of, man it was close, but the ball was out. Let's replay. Replay shows the ball was out clearly but they blew a whistle too soon so we can't give it to them because there was a pile of bodies like every loose ball in which we have to dig in and make a judgement on who recovered. and clearly GB did, but we can't call it that because we didn't see him possess it clearly before the ensuing pile of bodies even though we can see the ball being pulled into his grasp and covered by his entire body as the pile builds up. It's a joke.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 860527, member: 10441"] It all boils down to training refs to officiate a game by the desired outcomes and not just by what they see on the field. If an official thinks he's down and the play is over, fine, blow the whistle. If he doesn't think he's down let it play a second. If you're not in position, you're not the whistle man. But what we get or officials trained for different situations and when to use a whistle and when not to for injury, for replay, for this, for that, rather than use the whistle to officiate what YOU SEE. i know they'll get some wrong. But they don't blow a whistle 2 years in a row in GB Detroit games to let it play out for replay despite not a single official seeing it touch a GB player, only replay can't get it right. Should have been blown dead the second a Detroit defender touched it. And yesterday they blow it quick and replay still can't get it right. Just get officials that call mostly a good game, they exist, we've had them before, and let them officiate a game by what they see and call it good. The rest just adds more layers of controversy and it doesn't help. Then we're sitting here today, man, it was close, but the ball was out. Instead of, man it was close, but the ball was out. Let's replay. Replay shows the ball was out clearly but they blew a whistle too soon so we can't give it to them because there was a pile of bodies like every loose ball in which we have to dig in and make a judgement on who recovered. and clearly GB did, but we can't call it that because we didn't see him possess it clearly before the ensuing pile of bodies even though we can see the ball being pulled into his grasp and covered by his entire body as the pile builds up. It's a joke. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
G
Griffin
Administrator
Members online
CarryTheG14
SudsMcBucky
Griffin
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: SudsMcBucky
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:15 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 9:26 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:57 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chandon Sullivan
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top