Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 308698" data-attributes="member: 1429">My eyes. Oh my eyes.My take? Jackson is a running back. Lemme re-phrase. Jackson is a common running back.If we had a great OL, JAckson would be getting amazing numbers. And the OL isn't blocking badly right now, so Jackson had a good game against a top D.And LTF is right, after more touches, after the D is tired, Jackson can be very effective.But, looking at film, Jackson gets too much bad yardage. Players like LT (fully healthy), Peterson, Johnson, they get the extra yardage. They're harder to bring down. They identify holes better.Jackson too many times leaves yardage on the field. If we were a running team, no way in hell we could rely on him. I do think that, once Nance gets the 3rd down role, jackson will get more carries, and the running game will be better. Not like with Grant, but better, though.</blockquote>

Total: 656 (members: 3, guests: 653)