Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Browns Shopping Around Haden
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 733712"><p>You're absolutely correct that teams trading for a player have to consider the contract they inherit by doing so.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I've mentioned repeatedly there was no reason for the Packers to trade for Haden.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I highly doubt Kizer will turn out to be the Browns franchise quarterback moving forward.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's possible that relying on Randall and Rollins to bounce back turns out to be a mistake as both struggled while being healthy last season as well though. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my opinion the cornerback position is still a question mark entering this season.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's possible that House is the only starter at cornerback who didn't play in the NFCCG at Atlanta. Unfortunately I don't consider him a significant upgrade and believe the Packers still lack a #1 CB.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm absolutely fine with the Packers not having offered Haden a similar contract to the one he signed with the Steelers. His concussion history is being blown out of proportion though as it seems he has only suffered a single one during his career.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 733712"] You're absolutely correct that teams trading for a player have to consider the contract they inherit by doing so. As I've mentioned repeatedly there was no reason for the Packers to trade for Haden. I highly doubt Kizer will turn out to be the Browns franchise quarterback moving forward. It's possible that relying on Randall and Rollins to bounce back turns out to be a mistake as both struggled while being healthy last season as well though. In my opinion the cornerback position is still a question mark entering this season. It's possible that House is the only starter at cornerback who didn't play in the NFCCG at Atlanta. Unfortunately I don't consider him a significant upgrade and believe the Packers still lack a #1 CB. I'm absolutely fine with the Packers not having offered Haden a similar contract to the one he signed with the Steelers. His concussion history is being blown out of proportion though as it seems he has only suffered a single one during his career. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ExpatPacker
swhitset
Schultz
Magooch
rmontro
Packermudgeon
U.P. Packfan
shockerx
Latest posts
S
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: swhitset
A moment ago
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 3:33 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:27 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Browns Shopping Around Haden
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top