Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brandon Jackson
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="all about da packers" data-source="post: 166742" data-attributes="member: 227"><p>IF that is true, then why exactly is B-Jack starting?</p><p></p><p>And how exactly can you say this with such assurance? Perhaps it was the o-line, and not B-Jack, that the coach had no confidence in? There were rumblings on a site that Pack93z provided a while back that said that McCarthy was displeased with how the starting O-line was doing in practice. Perhaps McCarthy knew the O-line (and not B-Jack) couldn't be counted on as of right now. </p><p></p><p>B-Jack made some gains late in the game, but more importantly when he had some space to operate, he did some nifty things. The two passes he caught for double digit gains, he made defenders miss. Those were very impressive plays (not the throws, but what B-Jack did to gain extra yardage).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, IF McCarthy has no confidence in B-Jack's running ability, why did he play him so much? In McCarthy's system, Favre has the option to change the play from a run to a pass or vice versa if he sees fit. </p><p></p><p>Given this ability to audible, IF McCarthy truly had no confidence in B-Jack's ability, he'd have only sent him on sure passing down, instead of sending him out on a majority of downs like he did on Sunday. McCarthy would have no assurance that a run play would be changed at the line by Favre.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="all about da packers, post: 166742, member: 227"] IF that is true, then why exactly is B-Jack starting? And how exactly can you say this with such assurance? Perhaps it was the o-line, and not B-Jack, that the coach had no confidence in? There were rumblings on a site that Pack93z provided a while back that said that McCarthy was displeased with how the starting O-line was doing in practice. Perhaps McCarthy knew the O-line (and not B-Jack) couldn't be counted on as of right now. B-Jack made some gains late in the game, but more importantly when he had some space to operate, he did some nifty things. The two passes he caught for double digit gains, he made defenders miss. Those were very impressive plays (not the throws, but what B-Jack did to gain extra yardage). Also, IF McCarthy has no confidence in B-Jack's running ability, why did he play him so much? In McCarthy's system, Favre has the option to change the play from a run to a pass or vice versa if he sees fit. Given this ability to audible, IF McCarthy truly had no confidence in B-Jack's ability, he'd have only sent him on sure passing down, instead of sending him out on a majority of downs like he did on Sunday. McCarthy would have no assurance that a run play would be changed at the line by Favre. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DABIGZ
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Heyjoe4
49 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Thirteen Below
56 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Heyjoe4
56 minutes ago
Draft Talk
C
Who Will Start?
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 3:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brandon Jackson
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top