Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 909573" data-attributes="member: 7261">This is exactly what I have been "preaching" for years, yet the Packers always tended to be content with a little or no experienced #2 QB behind Rodgers.  So not sure if Bortles is a shift in their thought process and policy or a straight up contingency plan of having him be their starter if Rodgers is gone.  I tend to think the later and they didn't want to wait any longer and run the risk they lose Rodgers and Blake isn't available.  Either way, its a good signing IMO.  No Rodgers, Blake and Love will probably both get some playing time during the start of the "rebuild after Rodger's era". Rodgers plays in Green Bay and you finally have a decent #2 waiting, in the event of an injury.Of course, the Love haters should be jumping all over this news, as solid proof that Love was a terrible pick.  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></blockquote>

Total: 626 (members: 2, guests: 624)