Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 720182" data-attributes="member: 10441">it has nothing to do with average amount of injuries, though I don't need to see the post to know who posted it.  Probably something about mindboggling has been mentioned 2-3 times already too, but I digress.  It was the position where they hit and how often and what type.  It was the constant rotation.  I think it would have been better for our team to have 2 of those guys go out in week 4 than have the constant rotation game after game and half after half.  That detroit game was fairly typical.  Randall had a shoulder injury I think.  Wasn't practicing, came in and played, left with a knee injury.  Rollins wasn't practicing, came into the game with an injury and left on a stretcher.  that Dorleant came in after being activated from the IR a couple weeks earlier and left with a season ending injury.I think it would have been better off to just have the first  2 or 3 be done for the year and then have health at least with the younger guys or lesser guys behind them, but we didn't even get that.  so while the total numbers may have been "average" it doesn't even begin to account for what really happened in stretches last year and to imply so is, "mind boggling" LOL</blockquote>

Total: 117 (members: 3, guests: 114)