Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Best offseason in the NFC north
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Carl" data-source="post: 614978" data-attributes="member: 9497"><p>All am trying to say is a board, which should be based on talent and ability to play, should not take need into account. Other factors come into play when players are rated similarly. And yes there are players with off the field issues that exceptions. </p><p></p><p>For example, say we have 10 possible players to pick from:</p><p></p><p>9 players all rated exactly the same, but not a need position.</p><p>1 player rated slightly lower but at a need.</p><p></p><p>If the board takes need into account, the 1 lower player is jumped to the top of the board. We then end up reaching for a guy over 9 other better guys.</p><p></p><p>If the board doesn't take need into account, we see taking the player of need would be a reach. If we want him, trading down would be the better option.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Carl, post: 614978, member: 9497"] All am trying to say is a board, which should be based on talent and ability to play, should not take need into account. Other factors come into play when players are rated similarly. And yes there are players with off the field issues that exceptions. For example, say we have 10 possible players to pick from: 9 players all rated exactly the same, but not a need position. 1 player rated slightly lower but at a need. If the board takes need into account, the 1 lower player is jumped to the top of the board. We then end up reaching for a guy over 9 other better guys. If the board doesn't take need into account, we see taking the player of need would be a reach. If we want him, trading down would be the better option. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
TEXPAC2
gopkrs
Latest posts
NFC North Predictions
Latest: gopkrs
20 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: rmontro
41 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: Pkrjones
51 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2022 Draft Romeo Doubs #132
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:42 PM
Draft Talk
Just found out
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 3:14 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Best offseason in the NFC north
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top