Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 614783" data-attributes="member: 4300">You may not like what I posted but I and others have posted a lot of evidence Thompson doesn't draft BPA. Here’s a discussion you participated in, in which HRE was arguing Rodgers was a need pick and I was arguing the Rodgers pick was a rare example of BPA:<a href="https://www.packerforum.com/threads/2013-needs.41284/#post-475576" target="_blank">https://www.packerforum.com/threads/2013-needs.41284/#post-475576</a>Here's a thread I started on the subject: <a href="https://www.packerforum.com/threads/bpa-bva-and-tiers-of-talent-in-the-draft.35167/" target="_blank">https://www.packerforum.com/threads/bpa-bva-and-tiers-of-talent-in-the-draft.35167/</a>Not a “shred of evidence”? As captainWIMM mentioned, if need at a position is a factor, the GM is no longer picking the BPA. Purely picking BPA would be foolish - over 11 drafts we’d see multiple picks at positions of strength. Of course Thompson wouldn’t be so foolish.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 37 (members: 0, guests: 37)