Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 893139" data-attributes="member: 7261">We will never know.  Maybe Packers trade the pick to a QB hungry team and still have 5 more years of mediocrity or get a cache of picks in the trade and are SB bound without Favre?  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" data-shortname=":)" />  I'm not trying to sway how you or anyone feels about those final games of the year and can see advantages to taking different approaches or a combination of.  I'm not shy in saying that if I was a GM of a team in desperate need of a QB and Trevor Lawrence was within my reach, I would not feel one bit of remorse clearing my bench for that final game.BTW....no using "all those fans who paid good money for their tickets to see a game" as an excuse THIS year!  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/roflmao.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":roflmao:" title="ROFLMAO    :roflmao:" data-shortname=":roflmao:" />I do find it interesting that some people aren't opposed to sitting starters once they have a comfortable lead in a game or if the the playoff position is locked up.  How long do you want to see Rodgers play against the Bears if they have the #1 seed locked up?  Would you sit him if it meant a higher probability of losing that game?</blockquote>

Total: 1,034 (members: 1, guests: 1,033)