Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
Battle of the Henrys
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4zone" data-source="post: 659646" data-attributes="member: 10846"><p>I've tinkered around a lot with mock drafts this year and it consistently lays out better to take a DT in the 1st unless you can get a top 4 OT that can pull OG duty and play both OT positions. Then you have to grab him. Cody Whitehair at OG would be a real hard guy to pass up at #27 too considering both Lang and Sitton are FA's next year. An instant replacement for a fraction of the price.</p><p></p><p>Tough choices for sure. My hesitancy to take a LB in Rd 1 is there doesn't appear to be more than 1 or two that are 3 down guys and I don't find value in that at Rd. 1. If we end up taking Ragland, it won't hurt us but I don't think he would be the best value at that pick. Then again, maybe the Lines get picked clean early as well and he ends up being the best guy left on the board. Who knows.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4zone, post: 659646, member: 10846"] I've tinkered around a lot with mock drafts this year and it consistently lays out better to take a DT in the 1st unless you can get a top 4 OT that can pull OG duty and play both OT positions. Then you have to grab him. Cody Whitehair at OG would be a real hard guy to pass up at #27 too considering both Lang and Sitton are FA's next year. An instant replacement for a fraction of the price. Tough choices for sure. My hesitancy to take a LB in Rd 1 is there doesn't appear to be more than 1 or two that are 3 down guys and I don't find value in that at Rd. 1. If we end up taking Ragland, it won't hurt us but I don't think he would be the best value at that pick. Then again, maybe the Lines get picked clean early as well and he ends up being the best guy left on the board. Who knows. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Half Empty
Green_Bay_Packers
Krabs
Latest posts
Who Will Start?
Latest: Krabs
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Krabs
23 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Moving Up
Latest: PikeBadger
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Backed Into A Corner?
Latest: gopkrs
47 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: PikeBadger
Today at 9:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
Battle of the Henrys
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top