Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bates vs Sherman/Rossley
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackerTraxx" data-source="post: 21843" data-attributes="member: 146"><p>Personally, I never said the extension was a good thing. In fact, if I was TT I would NOT have given it to Sherman. If his players really wanted to play for him they would have done so to protect his job. If the players lay down on him to cost him his job, they aren't going to play for him at a high level just because he has a contract.</p><p></p><p>That being said, I understand the other side of the coin as far as the extension. It gives him leverage and every opportunity get the job done. But the bottom line is that players will play at a championship level for a leader, they won't play at that level for a boss.</p><p></p><p>His game preparation, strategy and critcal decisions during the game leave much to be desired. </p><p></p><p>I was hoping he not having to perform GM duties and the experience he has gained would improve those things. I'm still hoping, I wish he would somehow turn into a great coach this year. But I don't see that happening.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackerTraxx, post: 21843, member: 146"] Personally, I never said the extension was a good thing. In fact, if I was TT I would NOT have given it to Sherman. If his players really wanted to play for him they would have done so to protect his job. If the players lay down on him to cost him his job, they aren't going to play for him at a high level just because he has a contract. That being said, I understand the other side of the coin as far as the extension. It gives him leverage and every opportunity get the job done. But the bottom line is that players will play at a championship level for a leader, they won't play at that level for a boss. His game preparation, strategy and critcal decisions during the game leave much to be desired. I was hoping he not having to perform GM duties and the experience he has gained would improve those things. I'm still hoping, I wish he would somehow turn into a great coach this year. But I don't see that happening. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
Pkrjones
Latest posts
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
3 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 4:57 AM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
R
My double secret probation final mock draft
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 12:48 AM
Draft Talk
R
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 11:37 PM
Draft Talk
R
Final Annoying Mock/Prediction
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 11:36 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bates vs Sherman/Rossley
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top